Improving Candidate Hit Rates

Improving Candidate Hit Rates

At Pragna, we took upon the challenge of improving the candidate hit rates for Full-time (FTE) hiring. Improving the hit rates obviously provides significant advantage to Organizations – They can spend more time with project work and employee training than interviewing loads and loads of candidates for each position.
Here is a snapshot of the process that enabled us to achieve 100% or better improvement with candidate hit rates:
1. Sourcing:
  • Working with hiring managers, we prepared a very detailed profile of the position through sourcing.
  • We employed targeted headhunting through social sites to identify a pool of passive candidates.
  • We used a team that worked round-the-clock (from Seattle & Bangalore) to cover all timezones and international candidates.
2. Technical Screening – Written
  • We prepared a technical screening questionnaire tailored to each position and the job level
  • The written answers are thoroughly evaluated by competent technical people (not recruiters but sr. engineers)
  • We shortlisted candidates based on written test and examination of resume (spend 20 mins on reviewing/understanding resume vs. 2 mins
3. Technical Screening – In-depth Pragna Interview
  • This interview is done by senior engineers of the same job level
  • We did live meeting interview to visually see the coding abilities
4. Prepare a Candidate Scorecard
  • We prepared a detailed analysis report that Pragna sent to hiring managers with details from our interview
  • We identified strengths & weaknesses along with detailed descriptions of the problem we worked with the candidate
  • Then we submitted the candidate with all the above documentation (saved managers precious time to weed out 90% of the candidates)
5. Optimization
  • We reviewed feedback on candidates after each client interview
  • Based on each candidate (successful or not), we optimized and updated our process to improve it
This resulted in significant gains to the organization in terms of both saving their precious time and getting better candidates and hires for the organization.
Contract or Full Time Which is the Best Method for Hiring

Contract or Full Time Which is the Best Method for Hiring

Introduction Contract vs Full-Time Hiring

When it comes to expanding your team, the choice between contract and full-time hiring can be challenging. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages. Understanding these can help you make an informed decision, lets see which is better Contract vs Full-Time Hiring.

Benefits of Contract Hiring
Flexibility

Contract hiring offers significant flexibility. You can bring in experts for specific projects without a long-term commitment. This method allows for adjusting the workforce based on current needs.

Cost-Effectiveness

Hiring contractors can be cost-effective. You avoid expenses such as benefits, pensions, and insurance. Contractors are usually responsible for their taxes and benefits, reducing your financial burden.

Specialized Skills

Contractors often bring specialized skills to the table. They can provide expertise that your current team might lack, ensuring high-quality work for niche projects.

Advantages of Full-Time Hiring
Stability

Full-time employees provide stability. They are dedicated to your company and its long-term goals. This loyalty can translate into consistent performance and a deeper understanding of your business.

Team Integration

Full-time staff integrate better into your company culture. They build stronger relationships with colleagues, which can enhance teamwork and productivity.

Employee Development

Investing in full-time employees allows for skill development. Training and development programs can enhance their abilities, benefiting your company in the long run.

Challenges of Contract Hiring
Lack of Commitment

Contractors may lack commitment. They often juggle multiple projects, which can affect their dedication to your work. This might lead to issues with reliability and consistency.

Limited Control

Managing contractors can be challenging. Since they are not bound by the same rules as full-time employees, enforcing company policies and quality standards might be harder.

Drawbacks of Full-Time Hiring
Higher Costs

Full-time employees come with higher costs. Salaries, benefits, and other expenses add up. This can be a significant financial burden, especially for small businesses.

Less Flexibility

Full-time hiring offers less flexibility. Reducing your workforce during low-demand periods can be difficult and costly due to labor laws and contracts.

When to Choose Contract Hiring
Project-Based Needs

Opt for contract hiring for short-term or project-based needs. It allows you to access specialized skills without a long-term commitment.

Budget Constraints

If budget constraints are a concern, contractors can be a viable solution. You pay only for the work done, avoiding ongoing financial commitments.

When to Choose Full-Time Hiring
Long-Term Growth

For long-term growth and stability, full-time hiring is ideal. It ensures you have a dedicated team working towards your company’s objectives.

Building a Strong Culture

To build a strong company culture, full-time employees are essential. They become an integral part of your organization, fostering a cohesive work environment.

Conclusion

Choosing between contract and full-time hiring depends on your specific needs and circumstances. Weigh the benefits and drawbacks of each method carefully. This ensures you make the best decision for your company’s growth and success.

For more about Recruitment updates follow our Insights for more info Contact Pragna Solutions for your all RPO Recruiting and Offshore Recruiting Solutions.